Kristo Vaher

Social Media

The following is a brief opinion-piece of Marika Lüders’ “Conceptualizing Personal Media”, available here.

Paper by Marika Lüders was an interesting read and mostly dealt with social influence over new media and mass media and how every individual can nowadays play a role in mass media and its implications on larger scale. This is especially evident in recent years, with the term ‘viral’ becoming almost everyday in use. While Lüders paper did not discuss the word, usually it is the individual achievements – blog posts, comics, video clips – that become viral and become influental part in media and mass media in general through new media channels, while otherwise might be considered personal in every other sense of the word.

Read the rest of this entry »

Lev Manovich

The following is a critical review of this paper.

Having dealt with the concept of New Media as part of my studies, I had not read Lev Manovich’ interpretation of the concept before, despite being aware that he is one of the more known names related to New Media. While the book is relatively old by today’s standards, having been released in 2001, especially in the field that is constantly changing, I did not approach the chapter with prejudice. As expected, Manovich begins by listing various technologies that are most common to the concept and are most often tied with New Media. He believes that this is too limiting a way to define New Media. He asks how can we define media as ‘new’, if all it does is simply store information more efficiently than before?

Read the rest of this entry »

Cornell Box

The following is a critical review of this paper. While this was not part of the course task, I still attached it with the course tag for those who might find it interesting.

Having some experience with digital art and the ‘illusions’ of cinema, I was interested in reading and reviewing the text the very moment I noticed it. Manovich begins with an interesting example of a legendary Greek painter painting grapes of such a quality that they deceived birds, making them think that these were real grapes. Such an early example of illusion created through art rings true even today, when specific schools of art still aim to replicate real life as closely as possible. This is no more true than in computer games, that attempt to achieve visual realism and movies, which attempt to merge these very same illusions with real stock footage.

Read the rest of this entry »

Keyboard smileys!

I must admit that I have read far too many articles on interactivity in recent weeks. But this has given me a couple of thoughts I would like to share. I dealt with interactivity in one of my recent posts in relation to a course I am taking in university, but I am now going to tackle the other side of the coin: the less ‘academically correct’ personal side. If we consider interactivity a property of technology that attempts to mimic and support – in the long run – as closely as possible interpersonal relationships, then this can have a serious impact on how we communicate and keep in touch in general. We have only recently been introduced to such a world, but it will be our children who will grow up in this new ‘network of emotions’, where we share private details of our lives with not only friends, but also strangers and have that impact on their perceptions of us.

Read the rest of this entry »

Intellectual Property?

Following is an opinion and short summary of this chapter from Brian Martin’s book ‘Information Liberation’.

Copyrights and Intellectual Property related problems are of great personal interest to me as a developer looking to set up his own start-up company in the future, so it was great to read Brian Martin’s views on Intellectual Property, even though I considered myself fairly up to date on problems related to it. Martin begins the chapter by outlining what intellectual property is and how the modern technology, such as digital documents and transfers, have made sharing information easier and how it differs from ownership of physical objects.

Read the rest of this entry »

Multi-touch

After reading couple of white papers on interactivity, one by Jensen and another by Kiousis, it became apparent that interactivity cannot simply be defined. Both authors looked into papers previously released and attempted to find the meaning of the word through the works of others, but since most of those views differed from one another significantly, it was apparent that interactivity cannot really be defined so that it becomes satisfactory to majority. This was why both Jensen and Kiousis ended up making compromises in their definitions. The more detailed and scientific the definition becomes, the more there are views that disagree on certain aspects of the definition, or the more restricted the definition becomes without being as encompassing as ‘science’ would demand.

Read the rest of this entry »

Shh!

This is a post written while keeping in mind the students at Tallinn University, but the same applies to any and every user of public WiFi. The original article that is being referred to is available here. It deals with a Firefox extension that can be used to listen in on public WiFi network communication.

The following is a must read, especially since the students use public WiFi in Tallinn University quite a bit. Programs have existed for the following for many years, but the fact that it is now available as a simple extension, is very problematic. In short, if you ever use a public unsecured WiFi, then you are in danger of your privacy being compromised just by another user in the same network, using a web browser with a small extension.

Read the rest of this entry »

Following is an opinion and short summary of this paper by S. Kiousis.

Kiousis’ paper acts almost like a sequel to Jens F. Jensens paper previously looked at here. It deals with the similar problem that Jensen dealt with, attempting to define Interactivity. Somewhat unsurprisingly, he ends up in a similar situation as Jensen, without a clear definition (or explication, as the title) of the word. Instead Kiousis hopes that his work allows others to reach a better end result in the future by somewhat showing the way to future research. Large part of the paper dealt with – somewhat similarly to Jensen – going over previous definitions of the word (including that of Jensen in numerous occasions). Despite using Chaffee’s framework, most of the steps were covered with quotes and references.

Read the rest of this entry »

WBS

Eesti keeles:

Järgnev on Locamotion projekti WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) ja ajagraafik. WBS on projekti kohta aktuaalsem, kuna tegelik ajagraafik saab olema tugevalt mõjutatud meeskonna ajast ning õppetööga seotud võimalustest.

Kodutöö autorid on Kairi Fimberg ja Kristo Vaher.

Read the rest of this entry »

Interactive!

Following is an opinion and short summary of this paper by Jens F. Jensen.

Jensen takes a rather scientific view on what interactivity is about in his 1998 paper about interactivity. During the years where interactivity was still in the very early stages, the paper has an interesting perspective on what interactivity is and/or could be. I was somewhat bothered about how outdated some of the examples, illustrations and text in general was, but thankfully it did not get in the way of what Jensen was aiming for. This paper considered high degree of interactivity in things like computer message boards and computer teleconferencing. This was years when terms such as Web 2.0, AJAX driven web applications, smartphones and even instant messaging were not really known. Internet had only 147 million users in 1998, compared to 2 billion we have today, which does not even take into account the amount of time people spend online today, as opposed to 1998. It was a different world. Has ‘interactivity’ gotten a new meaning since?

Read the rest of this entry »